Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Assignment # 8 Due 11-19-13

“Sir, we have, in this country, no adequate idea of humanity yet; the nation does not feel that these are men, it cannot see through the dark skin and curly hair of the black man, anything like humanity, or that has claims to human rights. Had they been white men and women, or were they regarded as human beings, this nation would have been agitated to its centre, and rocked as with an earthquake shock, and like the nations of the Old World, would have rung with the thunders of freedom against tyranny, at such an event as this.”

Frederick Douglas
Speech at the Anti-Slavery Association – 1848

In this passage Frederick Douglas is discussing the inhumane way in which black people were viewed and treated as slaves. Black people were considered less than people as white society could not see pass their differences, “dark skin and curly hair.” If the situation were in reverse and white men and women were viewed in the negative ways in which black men and women were viewed it would have been unacceptable. As Douglas stated, this nation would have been agitated to its centre, and rocked as with an earthquake shock.” The people of this nation would not have accepted slavery or mistreatment of whites in any way, shape or form.
This passage relates to our class by discussing how slavery is unjust and inhumane. This week’s lecture discussed the members of the abolition and women's rights movements. Frederick Douglas was an important member of those movements has he fought to end slavery which is depicted in the passage above. Douglas fought for the freedom of slaves through civil disobedience. He felt that the laws of the government were unjust and did something about it by promoting the freedom of black slaves.
This passage is significant because it sheds light on the inequalities of our nation at the time. Blacks were enslaved, abused and mistreated because of the color of their skin and the texture of their hair. In present day society many people still experience discrimination and racism in their everyday life. As a nation we have come a long way, but we also have a long way to go.

“The wife who inherits no property holds about the same legal position that does the slave on the southern plantation. She can own nothing, sell nothing. She has no right even to the wages she earns; her person, her time, her services are the property of another. She cannot testify, in many cases, against her husband. She can get no redress for wrongs in her own name in any court of justice. She can neither sue nor be sued. She is not held morally responsible for any crime committed in the presence of her husband, so completely is her very existence supposed by the law to be merged in that of another.”

Elizabeth Cady Stanton
“Address to the New York State Legislature” - (1860)

In this passage Elizabeth Stanton discusses the many rights that women did not have. Women could not own or sell anything, testify against their husband, or sue or be sued. According to Stanton, the rights of women were equal to that of a slave on a southern plantation. The very existence of women’s being was through that of another, her husband. Women had no self-identity or rights as an individual.
This passage is significant because it also sheds light on the inequalities of our nation. At the time in which this piece was written women were in a sense slaves as well. They could not do many things that men could do. They were seen as property of their husbands. In present day society the inequalities of men and women can be see in the work place. Men still earn more money than women and receive more respect than women in positions of power.

Monday, November 11, 2013



Assignment # 7 Due 11-12-13

“There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them; who, esteeming themselves children of Washington and Franklin, sit down with their hands in their pockets, and say that they know not what to do, and do nothing.”

Henry Thoreau
Civil Disobedience

            In this passage Thoreau is discussing the issues of slavery and war. As citizens of the United States, many knew that slavery and war was immorally wrong.  However, they did “nothing to put an end to them” as Thoreau stated. Many of these same citizens are said to be “children” of George Washington and Benjamin Franklin meaning they adamantly believed in their ideas and beliefs. George Washington and Benjamin Franklin had a common goal, which was to abolish slavery in the nation (although Washington owned slaves). They both did a great deal of work trying to do just that. One would think that as “children” of these men, American citizens would do a lot more to end the immoral issues of slavery and war. However, according to Thoreau many just sit around with “their hands in their pockets, and say that they know not what to do, and do nothing.” This is not representative of George Washington or Benjamin Franklin.
            I chose this quote because the topics of war and slavery are very important aspects of American History. To this day they are very controversial. Fortunately, slavery is no longer legal in the United States; although some people believe we Americans live in a modern day form of slavery. War still exists and continues to impact our lives in different ways. In today’s society there are people who are standing up for what they believe in and questioning the politics of the government. People protest, march, sign petitions, etc. to voice their opinions about certain issues within our country and/or state. There are also people who do not voice their opinion. Either way I feel that it is the choice of the person to take a stand for what they do or do not believe in. It does not make them any more or less of an American.

Go to the link for African-American Odyssey and under the section Abolition choose two topics from part 1 and part 2, research these topics, and summarize them and explain how they relate to the readings by Thoreau.

Part 1 – Antislavery Activists
            Many people were against slavery as it was seen as being immoral and a sin of god. This brought about the rise of many anti-slavery activists. Some of those activists include Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth, and William Lloyd Garrison. Harriet Tubman was the conductor of the “underground railroad” that freed hundreds of slaves as she made 19 trips to South over a ten-year span. Sojourner Truth was an abolitionist and women’s rights advocate. After being freed from slavery she traveled around the nation and preach the truth of god’s word. William Lloyd Garrison, a white abolitionist wrote songs and poems that were used to create enthusiasm during abolitionist society meetings. All of these anti-slavery activists and many more contributed to the rise against slavery.
            The topic of anti-slavery activists relates to Thoreau by being an example of Americans who disobey unjust laws. Slavery is unjust; therefore the anti-slavery activists had every right to be disobedient in a civil manner.
           
Part 2 –  The Fugitive Slave Law
            The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 mandated that states to which escaped slaves fled were obligated to return them to their masters upon their discovery and subjected persons who helped runaway slaves to criminal sanctions (thefreedictionary.com). This controversial law denied a fugitive’s right to a jury trial. This law put blacks at an increase risk of danger as many thought them to be slaves regardless of whether or not they were free. Many left their homes and fled to Canada. During the next ten years, an estimated 20,000 blacks moved to the neighboring country (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part4/4p2951.htmL). Northerners who did not support slavery became increasingly defiant against this law. The Underground Railroad became more active and the nation became further divided.
            The Fugitive Law of 1850 relates to Thoreau by being a clear example of an immoral law put forth by the government. According to Thoreau citizens have every right to be civil disobedient when something put forth by the government is deemed unjust. Forcing people to take part in the capturing of fugitive slaves is unjust because it denied a fugitive’s right to a jury trial and put the safety of freed Blacks at risk.